The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-7056•Paul Anthony Chenevert v. B. L. KANODE, Warden
23-7056Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 3, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-7056
PAUL ANTHONY CHENEVERT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
B. L. KANODE, Warden; A. WHITE, Asst. Warden; LT. COLNA; SGT. EVANS;
CHIEF KILBOURNE; R. HICKMAN, Investigator; LT. KING; CHADWICK
DOTSON, in his official capacity; HAROLD W. CLARKE, in his individual
capacity; A. DAVID ROBINSON; JOSEPH W. WALTERS; H. SCOTT
RICHESON; FRAZIER, Investigator at RN,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
OFFICER POTTER; JOHN DOE(S), Watch Commander at RNCC; JOHN/JANE
DOE, Correctional Officers at RNCC,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, District Judge. (7:21-cv-00562-EKD-JCH)
Submitted: May 30, 2024 Decided: June 3, 2024
Before GREGORY and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Paul Anthony Chenevert, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Paul Anthony Chenevert appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’
motion to dismiss his third amended civil rights complaint. The court concluded that
Chenevert’s third amended complaint did not comply with the requirements of Fed. R. Civ.
P. 8(a) and, regardless, failed to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Chenevert v. Kanode,
No. 7:21-cv-00562-EKD-JCH (W.D. Va., Sept. 26, 2023). We deny Chenevert’s motion
for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.