The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-7079•Wayne Arthur Jordan v. Thomas Seltzer
23-7079Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 24, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-7079
WAYNE ARTHUR JORDAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THOMAS SELTZER; WALTER WEST; VANESSA ANDERSON, Case
Management-Classification ECI; STEPHEN SANDERS; ROBERT L. GREEN,
Secretary-DPSCS; MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND
CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; J. PHILLIP MORGAN; MARYLAND
CORRECTIONAL ENTERPRISE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
George L. Russell, III, Chief District Judge. (1:21-cv-03048-GLR)
Submitted: September 30, 2024 Decided: October 24, 2024
Before HARRIS, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wayne Arthur Jordan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Wayne Arthur Jordan appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment
to Defendants on Jordan’s complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12132, and the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Jordan
v. Seltzer, No. 1:21-cv-03048-GLR (D. Md. Sept. 18, 2023). We also deny Jordan’s motion
to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.