The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-7111•Lamar Cannady v. MATTHEW SCHOFIELD, Public Defender, in his individual
23-7111Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 2, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-7111
LAMAR CANNADY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MATTHEW SCHOFIELD, Public Defender, in his individual and official capacity;
PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE-ADVOCATE OFFICE, County of Polk, in its
official capacity; COUNTY OF POLK, State of North Carolina funded, in its official
capacity; POLK COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, in its official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Asheville. Kenneth D. Bell, District Judge. (1:23-cv-00168-KDB)
Submitted: February 27, 2024 Decided: March 1, 2024
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lamar Cannady, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lamar Cannady appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Cannady v. Schofield,
No. 1:23-cv-00168-KDB (W.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 2023). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.