The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-7173•Robert Z. Whipple, Iii v. Warden Katina Heckard; W. Holzapfel
23-7173Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 11, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-7173
ROBERT Z. WHIPPLE, III,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN KATINA HECKARD; W. HOLZAPFEL,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at
Beckley. Frank W. Volk, District Judge. (5:23-cv-00416)
Submitted: May 3, 2024 Decided: July 11, 2024
Before GREGORY, RICHARDSON, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Z. Whipple, III, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Z. Whipple, III, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Whipple’s 28
U.S.C. § 2241 petition in which Whipple challenged the conditions of his confinement.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. Whipple v. Heckard, No. 5:23-cv-00416 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 2, 2023).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.