The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-7179•United States of America v. Roderick Lamar Williams, a/k/a Rox
23-7179Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 2, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-7179
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RODERICK LAMAR WILLIAMS, a/k/a Rox,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Statesville. Kenneth D. Bell, District Judge. (5:03-cr-00004-KDB-DSC-8)
Submitted: February 27, 2024 Decided: March 1, 2024
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roderick Lamar Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Roderick Lamar Williams appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to
correct the record under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Vanderhorst, 927 F.3d 824, 826-
27 (4th Cir. 2019) (stating standard). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
United States v. Williams, No. 5:03-cr-00004-KDB-DSC-8 (W.D.N.C. Nov. 1, 2023). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.