The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-7183•United States of America v. Claude Simpson
23-7183Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 24, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-7183
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CLAUDE SIMPSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Spartanburg. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (7:18-cr-00291-DCC-1)
Submitted: October 22, 2024 Decided: October 24, 2024
Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Claude Simpson, Appellant Pro Se. Winston Irwin Marosek, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Claude Simpson appeals the district court’s order denying his second motion for
compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have reviewed the
record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Simpson’s
motion. See United States v. Centeno-Morales, 90 F.4th 274, 280 (4th Cir. 2024) (stating
standard). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Simpson, No.
7:18-cr-00291-DCC-1 (D.S.C. Oct. 25, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.