The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-1114•Tony Gene Forrester. v. Barbara Lacina; Victoria Ann Latham; Teara S. Dargan
24-1114Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 10, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1114
TONY GENE FORRESTER.
Plaintiff - Appellant.
v.
BARBARA LACINA; VICTORIA ANN LATHAM; TEARA S. DARGAN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Newport News. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (4:23-cv-00019-AWA-DEM)
Submitted: December 5, 2024 Decided: December 9, 2024
Before GREGORY and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tony Gene Forrester, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tony Gene Forrester appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint
without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Forrester v.
Lacina, No. 4:23-cv-00019-AWA-DEM (E.D. Va. Jan. 9, 2024). We deny Forrester’s
motion to seal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.