Richard Peamon v. Rutgers University Press Ect.

24-1124Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 2, 2025

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1124
RICHARD PEAMON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY PRESS ECT.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Julie R. Rubin, District Judge. (1:23-cv-02128-JRR)
Submitted: August 28, 2025 Decided: September 2, 2025
Before GREGORY, QUATTLEBAUM, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Peamon, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Richard Peamon appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint without
prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) for failure to effect proper service. We have
reviewed the record and discern no abuse of discretion in the district court’s decision. See
Attkisson v. Holder, 925 F.3d 606, 627 (4th Cir. 2019) (providing standard). Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. Peamon v. Rutgers Univ. Press Ect., No. 1:23-cv-
02128-JRR (D. Md. Jan. 17, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.