The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-1156•Vladimir Kruglyak, d/b/a Fruklyak, Inc. v. Karen J. Phoebus
24-1156Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 27, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1156
VLADIMIR KRUGLYAK, d/b/a Fruklyak, Inc.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KAREN J. PHOEBUS,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.,
Defendant.
No. 25-1144
VLADIMIR KRUGLYAK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
No. 25-1795
VLADIMIR KRUGLYAK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Abingdon. Michael F. Urbanski, Senior District Judge. (1:22-cv-00024-MFU-PMS)
Submitted: October 14, 2025 Decided: November 26, 2025
Before GREGORY, HARRIS, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vladimir Kruglyak, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Vladimir Kruglyak appeals the district court’s orders in this civil action granting
Defendant Phoebus’s motion to dismiss, granting Defendant Home Depot’s consent to
judgment in favor of Kruglyak in the amount of $3,696.35, granting summary judgment to
Defendant Home Depot, and denying Kruglyak’s motions to reconsider. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the amended
motions to consolidate appeals as moot and affirm the district court’s orders. Kruglyak v.
Phoebus, No. 1:22-cv-00024-MFU-PMS (W.D. Va. Mar. 29, 2023; Feb. 15, 2024) (No.
24-1156); Kruglyak v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., No. 1:22-cv-00024-MFU-PMS (W.D. Va.
Sept. 26, 2024; filed Jan. 28, 2025 & entered Jan. 29, 2025) (No. 25-1144); Kruglyak v.
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., No. 1:22-cv-00024-MFU-PMS (W.D. Va. May 6, 2025; July 7,
2025) (25-1795). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.