The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-1182•In re: David Hill
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1182
In re: DAVID HILL,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia at Alexandria. (1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1)
Submitted: April 18, 2024 Decided: April 22, 2024
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Hill, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David Hill petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has
unduly delayed in ruling on several postjudgment motions filed in Hill’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255
proceeding. See United States v. Hill, No. 1:01-cr-00191-CMH-1 (E.D. Va., PACER
Nos. 464-69). Hill seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act.
However, upon review, the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court,
especially since, in the interim period, Hill has noted several appeals from other district
court orders. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition.∗ We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
∗ While we deny mandamus relief at this juncture, we encourage the district court
to act as expeditiously as possible in this matter.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.