The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-1220•Min Tang v. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
24-1220Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 13, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1220
MIN TANG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Stephanie A. Gallagher, District Judge. (8:21-cv-02739-SAG)
Submitted: March 13, 2025 Decided: June 13, 2025
Before HARRIS, RUSHING, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Richard L. Swick, SWICK & SHAPIRO, P.C., Washington, D.C., for
Appellant. Erek L. Barron, United States Attorney, Molissa H. Farber, Assistant United
States Attorney, Andrew Moreira, Student Law Clerk, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Min Tang appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of
Defendant on Tang’s retaliation claim, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Tang v. Kennedy, No.
8:21-cv-02739-SAG (D. Md. Jan. 24, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.