Patricia Mitchell v. Booz Allen Hamilton

24-1223Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 19, 2025

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1223
PATRICIA MITCHELL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Patricia Tolliver Giles, District Judge. (1:23-cv-00653-PTG-LRV)
Submitted: May 15, 2025 Decided: May 19, 2025
Before NIEMEYER and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patricia Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Louise Johnson, POTTER & MURDOCK,
PC, Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Patricia Mitchell appeals the district court’s order granting Booz Allen Hamilton’s
Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss Mitchell’s third amended complaint filed
pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. On
appeal, Mitchell contests only the district court’s dismissal of her retaliation claim.
Limiting our review of the record to the claims Mitchell raises on appeal, see 4th
Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014), and finding no
reversible error, we affirm the decision of the district court. Mitchell v. Booz Allen
Hamilton, No. 1:23-cv-00653-PTG-LRV (E.D. Va. Mar. 7, 2024). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.