The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-1300•Zachary Knotts v. KEITH WHITE, Esq.; HONORABLE THOMAS A. BEDELL
24-1300Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 23, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1300
ZACHARY KNOTTS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KEITH WHITE, Esq.; HONORABLE THOMAS A. BEDELL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at
Clarksburg. Thomas S. Kleeh, Chief District Judge. (1:23-cv-00028-TSK-MJA)
Submitted: September 19, 2024 Decided: September 23, 2024
Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Zachary Knotts, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Scott Blevins, Mark Richard Simonton, OFFUTT
SIMMONS SIMONTON, PLLC, Huntington, West Virginia; Dallas Floyd Kratzer, III,
STEPTOE LLP, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Zachary Knotts appeals the district court’s order accepting in part the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction Knotts’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint.* We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Knotts v. White,
No. 1:23-cv-00028-TSK-MJA (N.D. W. Va. Feb. 15, 2024). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Knotts also seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P.
59(e) motion to reconsider. Because Knotts did not file an amended notice of appeal after
the entry of that order, it is not properly before us. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(ii).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.