The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-1431•Reginald Mack v. United States of America
24-1431Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 23, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1431
REGINALD MACK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. (2:22-cv-00315-RBS-DEM)
Submitted: September 19, 2024 Decided: September 23, 2024
Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reginald Mack, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Patrick Shean, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Reginald Mack appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the
United States on Mack’s complaint filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.
§§ 1346(b), 2671-80. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Mack v. United States, No. 2:22-cv-
00315-RBS-DEM (E.D. Va. Apr. 12, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.