In re: Laura Kristen Boyd Meador

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1440
In re: LAURA KRISTEN BOYD MEADOR,
Petitioner.
No. 24-1470
In re: LAURA KRISTEN BOYD MEADOR,
Petitioner.
On Petitions for Writs of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Beaufort. (9:22-cr-00520-RMG-1)
Submitted: July 25, 2024 Decided: July 30, 2024
Before GREGORY, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Petitions denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Laura Kristen Boyd Meador, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated petitions for writs of mandamus, Laura Kristen Boyd Meador
asks this court to appoint her a guardian ad litem and counsel, direct the district court judge
presiding over her pending criminal prosecution to rule on her pro se motions, and order
her immediate release from incarceration and placement in witness protection. We
conclude that Meador is not entitled to mandamus relief.
Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary
circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re Murphy-Brown,
LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Further, mandamus relief is available only when
the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought and “has no other adequate means to
attain the relief [she] desires.” Murphy-Brown, 907 F.3d at 795 (cleaned up).
The relief sought by Meador is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly,
we deny the petitions for writs of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITIONS DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --