The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-1489•In re: DAVID W. SCHAMENS v. DANIEL C. BRUTON, Trustee -
24-1489Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 5, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1489
In re: DAVID W. SCHAMENS,
Debtor.
-----------------------------------
DAVID W. SCHAMENS,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
DANIEL C. BRUTON,
Trustee - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:24-cv-00287-WO)
Submitted: June 27, 2025 Decided: August 5, 2025
Before KING, RICHARDSON, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
David W. Schamens, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Clarkson Bruton, BELL, DAVIS & PITT,
PA, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
David W. Schamens appeals the district court’s order granting his motion to
withdraw his appeal from two bankruptcy court’s orders. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Schamens v.
Bruton, No. 1:24-cv-00287-WO (M.D.N.C. May 22, 2024). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.