The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-1500•Michael Breyan v. Bank of America
24-1500Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 16, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1500
MICHAEL BREYAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (3:24-cv-00980-BHH)
Submitted: September 12, 2024 Decided: September 16, 2024
Before THACKER and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Breyan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Breyan appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s
recommendation to dismiss, upon 28 U.S.C. § 1915 review, Breyan’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983
action against Bank of America. Limiting our review to the issues raised in Breyan’s
informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b); Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014),
and to the magistrate judge’s rulings to which Breyan specifically objected, see Martin v.
Duffy, 858 F.3d 239, 245 (4th Cir. 2017), we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s order. Breyan v. Bank of Am., No. 3:24-cv-00980-BHH (D.S.C.
May 16, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.