The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-1541•Thomas J. Ayers v. Joseph Markiewicz
24-1541Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 15, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1541
THOMAS J. AYERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOSEPH MARKIEWICZ; MARY BETH MARKIEWICZ; DOUGLAS WEIR;
LEADERSHIP TEAM DEVELOPMENT, INC.; AMWAY CORPORATION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:23-cv-00442-D-BM)
Submitted: October 10, 2024 Decided: October 15, 2024
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas J. Ayers, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Walker Fulton, Geoffrey Alexander Marcus,
Elizabeth A. Martineau, MARTINEAU KING PLLC, Charlotte, North Carolina;
Luke Andrew Dalton, MCANGUS GOUDELOCK & COURIE, PLLC, Raleigh, North
Carolina; Steven Andrew Bader, Raleigh, North Carolina, Patrick Houghton Flanagan,
Ariella Zulman Walsh, CRANFILL SUMNER, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina; Edward
Joseph Bardelli, Daniel Stephen Brookins, WARNER, NORCROSS & JUDD, LLP, Grand
Rapids, Michigan, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas J. Ayers appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motions to
compel arbitration, dismissing his civil action, and ordering that he arbitrate his claims.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. Ayers v. Markiewicz, No. 5:23-cv-00442-D-BM (E.D.N.C. May 9,
2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.