The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-1560•Samuel T. Whatley, Ii; Reverend Dr. Samuel T. Whatley v. BETHANY PHILLIPS, General Manager; U-HAUL; AMERCO; U-HAUL CO. OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC.
24-1560Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 23, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1560
SAMUEL T. WHATLEY, II; REVEREND DR. SAMUEL T. WHATLEY,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
BETHANY PHILLIPS, General Manager; U-HAUL; AMERCO; U-HAUL CO. OF
SOUTH CAROLINA, INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:22-cv-03528-RMG)
Submitted: September 19, 2024 Decided: September 23, 2024
Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel T. Whatley, II; Samuel T. Whatley, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Samuel T. Whatley II and Reverend Dr. Samuel T. Whatley appeal the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing for
failure to state a claim their amended complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Whatley v. Phillips, No.
2:22-cv-03528-RMG (D.S.C. May 29, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.