Robert W. Smith v. Antonyo D. Keller; Bigo Live

24-1561Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 18, 2024

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1561
ROBERT W. SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ANTONYO D. KELLER; BIGO LIVE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:23-cv-00524-MHL)
Submitted: September 30, 2024 Decided: October 18, 2024
Before THACKER and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert W. Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Robert W. Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing his second amended
complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, we confine our review to the
issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Smith’s informal brief
does not challenge the bases for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate
review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014)
(“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is
limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.