The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-1597•Samuel T. Whatley, Ii v. City of Charleston
24-1597Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 15, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1597
SAMUEL T. WHATLEY, II,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF CHARLESTON; KAY CROSS, Director of Human Resources at CoC;
JOHN J. TECKLENBURG, Mayor of CoC; CHARLESTON POLICE
DEPARTMENT; SOUTH CAROLINA HUMAN AFFAIRS COMMISSION,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:22-cv-03582-RMG)
Submitted: October 10, 2024 Decided: October 15, 2024
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel T. Whatley, II, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Samuel T. Whatley, II, appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing for failure to state a claim his
amended complaint alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Whatley v. City of Charleston, No. 2:22-
cv-03582-RMG (D.S.C. May 29, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.