In re: CHARLES ANTHONY WALKER, JR., a/k/a Supreme, a/k/a Preme

24-1608Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 16, 2024

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1608
In re: CHARLES ANTHONY WALKER, JR., a/k/a Supreme, a/k/a Preme,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. (2:18-cr-00037-FL-1)
Submitted: October 10, 2024 Decided: October 16, 2024
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Anthony Walker, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Charles Anthony Walker, Jr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the
district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He seeks an
order from this court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal
undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.