Wilson Ochar v. Lentegrity; Merlex Auto Group

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1648
WILSON OCHAR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LENTEGRITY; MERLEX AUTO GROUP,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:24-cv-00926-CMH-WBP)
Submitted: September 19, 2024 Decided: September 23, 2024
Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wilson Ochar, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Wilson Ochar appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to proceed in
forma pauperis. See Roberts v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 339 U.S. 844, 845 (1950) (per curiam)
(holding that order denying motion to proceed in forma pauperis is appealable interlocutory
order). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s order. Ochar v. Lentegrity, No. 1:24-cv-00926-CMH-WBP (E.D. Va.
June 27, 2024). In addition, we deny each of Ochar’s pending motions. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --