Kimarlo Ragland v. Nc Division of Employment Security

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1654
KIMARLO RAGLAND,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NC DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:24-cv-00204-M-RJ)
Submitted: October 24, 2024 Decided: January 13, 2025
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kimarlo Ragland, Appellant Pro Se. David John Adinolfi, II, Special Deputy Attorney
General, Robert Glen Peterson, EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION OF
NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Kimarlo Ragland appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and dismissing Ragland’s civil complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B).∗ We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. Ragland v. N.C. Div. of Emp. Sec., No. 5:24-cv-00204-
M-RJ (E.D.N.C. July 10, 2024). We also deny Ragland’s motion to disallow sanctions.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
∗ Ragland did not object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation regarding his
other claims, and he was warned of the consequences of failure to object. Accordingly, he
waived appellate review of the dismissal of his other claims. Martin v. Duffy, 858 F.3d
239, 245 (4th Cir. 2017).

-- 2 of 2 --