John C. Nelums; Delmarshi Nelums v. HUTCHENS LAW FIRM, LLP, a S.C. professional association

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1678
JOHN C. NELUMS; DELMARSHI NELUMS,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
HUTCHENS LAW FIRM, LLP, a S.C. professional association; PHH MORTGAGE
CORPORATION, a FL professional association; CASCADE FUNDING
MORTGAGE, a FL professional association; JOHN S. KAY, an individual;
JEANETTE MCBRIDE, an individual; JOSEPH STRICKLAND, an individual;
SEAN ADEGBOLA, an individual; ASHLEY Z. STANLEY, an individual; ALAN
M. STEWART, an individual; SARAH O. LEONARD, an individual; GREGORY
WOOTEN, an individual; LOUISE M. JOHNSON, an individual; LPS DEFAULT
SOLUTIONS INC.; W. JEFFREY BARNES, an individual,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:24-cv-02427-JFA)
Submitted: December 19, 2024 Decided: December 23, 2024
Before KING and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Calvin Nelums; Delmarshi, H. Nelums, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Plaintiffs John C. Nelums and Delmarshi Nelums appeal the district court’s order
adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss without prejudice, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915 review, Plaintiffs’ complaint seeking a temporary restraining order and
preliminary injunction against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Nelums v. Hutchens
Law Firm, No. 3:24-cv-02427-JFA (D.S.C. July 16, 2024). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --