The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-1691•Taqi Eyr Hhamul Hesed El, a/k/a Bro T. Hesed-El v. ROBIN BRYSON, Licensed Clinical Social Worker, in his individual
24-1691Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 31, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1691
TAQI EYR HHAMUL HESED EL, a/k/a Bro T. Hesed-El,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROBIN BRYSON, Licensed Clinical Social Worker, in his individual and official
capacity; MISSION HOSPITAL, INC.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at
Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:21-cv-00305-MR-WCM)
Submitted: September 9, 2025 Decided: October 31, 2025
Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bro T. Hesed-El, Appellant Pro Se. David Chase Hawisher, Phillip Theodore Jackson,
Benjamin Harris Van Steinburgh, ROBERTS & STEVENS, PA, Asheville, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Bro T. Hesed El appeals from the district court’s orders granting in part and denying
in part two defendants’ motion to dismiss, granting the remaining defendants’ motion for
summary judgment, and denying several other of Hesed El’s motions related to his gross
negligence, negligent infliction of emotional distress, negligent supervision, and
respondeat superior claims. We have reviewed the record in conjunction with the
arguments Hesed El raises on appeal and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm the district court’s orders. Hesed El v. Bryson, No. 1:21-cv-00305-MR-WCM
(W.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 2022; Nov. 28, 2023; Apr. 1, 2024; May 28, 2024; June 27, 2024).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFRIMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.