The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-1740•In re: David A. Stebbins
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1740
In re: DAVID A. STEBBINS,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. (2:24-cv-00140)
Submitted: September 19, 2024 Decided: September 24, 2024
Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David A. Stebbins, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
David A. Stebbins petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court
has unduly delayed in ruling on Stebbins’ application to proceed in forma pauperis and
motion for CM/ECF access, and in conducting a review, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, of
the sufficiency of Stebbins’ complaint filed in the underlying action. Stebbins seeks an
order from this court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal
undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.