The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-1753•Oluwakemi Adewol, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. Tginesis LLC
24-1753Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 13, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1753
OLUWAKEMI ADEWOL, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TGINESIS LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
George L. Russell, III, Chief District Judge. (1:23-cv-00509-GLR)
Submitted: February 25, 2025 Decided: June 13, 2025
Before GREGORY, AGEE, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Steffan T. Keeton, THE KEETON FIRM LLC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for
Appellant. Deirdre A. Close, Carson R. Griffis, CROKE FAIRCHILD DUARTE &
BERES, Chicago, Illinois; Michael D. Meuti, Meegan Brooks, Sheila M. Prendergast,
BENESCH, FRIEDLANDER COPLAN & ARONOFF LLP, Cleveland, Ohio, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Oluwakemi Adewol appeals the district court’s order dismissing for failure to state
a claim her civil complaint alleging a violation of the Maryland Consumer Protection Act.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. Adewol v. TGINESIS LLC, No. 1:23-cv-00509-GLR (D. Md. July 10,
2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.