The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-1754•Ron B. Lancaster v. Alamance County Honorable Kathryn W. Overby, in her individual
24-1754Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 10, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1754
RON B. LANCASTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ALAMANCE COUNTY HONORABLE KATHRYN W. OVERBY, in her
individual and official capacities; JOHN DOE CORPORATION, in its capacity as
surety on the official bond of the judgeship of Alamance County,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:23-cv-00620-WO-JLW)
Submitted: December 5, 2024 Decided: December 9, 2024
Before GREGORY and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ron B. Lancaster, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ron B. Lancaster appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and dismissing Lancaster’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as frivolous
and for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the
record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Lancaster’s motion for
appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s order. Lancaster v. Overby, No.
1:23-cv-00620-WO-JLW (M.D.N.C. July 10, 2024) We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.