The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-1839•Under Seal v. Virginia Board of Medicine
24-1839Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 26, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1839
UNDER SEAL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA BOARD OF MEDICINE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Michael Stefan Nachmanoff, District Judge. (1:20-cv-01406-MSN-WBP)
Submitted: November 14, 2025 Decided: November 25, 2025
Before GREGORY and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Under Seal, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Appellant Under Seal appeals the district court’s orders dismissing Appellant’s
complaint seeking damages from the Appellee pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and denying
Appellant’s motion for reconsideration. The district court concluded the complaint was
barred by the Eleventh Amendment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See Kentucky v. Graham, 473
U.S. 159, 169 (1985); Will v. Mich. Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 66-67 (1989);
Regents of the Univ. of Cal. v. Doe, 519 U.S. 425, 429-30 (1997). We grant the pending
motion to seal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.