The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-1850•Dexter J. Scott v. United States of America
24-1850Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 4, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1850
DEXTER J. SCOTT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, IRS Agents
any/all; DAVID A. HUBBERT, Deputy Assistant Attorney General;
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY; COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:23-cv-00566-D-BM)
Submitted: February 27, 2025 Decided: March 3, 2025
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dexter J. Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Michael J. Haungs, Supervisory Attorney, Carl D.
Wasserman, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dexter J. Scott appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice Scott’s
complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. Scott v. United States, No. 5:23-cv-00566-D-BM (E.D.N.C. Aug. 14, 2024). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.