The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-1894•Andrew Findlay v. Geoquip, Inc.
24-1894Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 14, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1894
ANDREW FINDLAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GEOQUIP, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Norfolk. Lawrence Richard Leonard, Magistrate Judge. (2:24-cv-00147-LRL)
Submitted: April 10, 2025 Decided: April 14, 2025
Before WILKINSON and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Todd M Gaynor, GAYNOR LAW CENTER, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellant. Anne Bibeau, W. Thomas Chappell, WOODS ROGERS VANDEVENTER
BLACK PLC, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Andrew Findlay appeals the magistrate judge’s* order granting summary judgment
on Findlay’s retaliation claim, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,
42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the magistrate judge’s order. Findlay v. GeoQuip, Inc., No. 2:24-
cv-00147-LRL (E.D. Va. Aug. 16, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The parties consented to disposition by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(c).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.