The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-1909•Timothy Dexter Walton v. Wvrj Managerial Administration
24-1909Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 21, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1909
TIMOTHY DEXTER WALTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WVRJ MANAGERIAL ADMINISTRATION AND STAFF; COX, Regional
Superintendent; SHAWN BODY, G.T.L. Telephone Manager; JOHN AND JANE
DOES, Civilian and Correctional Officers; CAPTAIN WILLIE SMITH; LT.
HAINES; SGT. TODD WILSON; WESTERN VIRGINIA REGIONAL JAIL
ADMINISTRATIVE HEADS AND STAFF; KRISTOPHER JOHNSTON;
PARKER BEARD, Disciplinary Officer; JONES, Laundry Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Roanoke. Thomas T. Cullen, District Judge. (7:23-cv-00436-TTC-JCH)
Submitted: October 2, 2025 Decided: October 21, 2025
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Dexter Walton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Dexter Walton appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error.
The district court did not err in concluding that Walton failed to put forth facts plausibly
stating cognizable claims as to supervisory liability, conspiracy, or retaliation. Further, to
the extent that Walton made claims regarding the inmate grievance procedures and
deprivation of his personal property, the district court did not err in concluding that those
claims were not cognizable in the instant § 1983 action. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. Walton v. WVRJ Managerial Admin. & Staff, No. 7:23-cv-00436-TTC-JCH
(W.D. Va. Aug. 29, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.