Maxo Jean v. PAMELA JO BONDI, Attorney General

24-1915Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 16, 2025

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1915
MAXO JEAN,
Petitioner,
v.
PAMELA JO BONDI, Attorney General ,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: June 12, 2025 Decided: June 16, 2025
Before HARRIS and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ON BRIEF: Stephen C. Fleming, LAW OFFICES OF STEPHEN C. FLEMING, State
College, Pennsylvania, for Petitioner. Brett A. Shumate, Acting Assistant Attorney
General, Daniel E. Goldman, Senior Litigation Counsel, John F. Stanton, Office of
Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington,
D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Maxo Jean, a native and citizen of Haiti, petitions for review of an order of the Board
of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s decision on
the ground that Jean waived his right to appeal. Upon review of the record, we agree with
the Board’s holding that Jean’s administrative appellate waiver was knowing and
intelligent and, thus, valid. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. See In re Jean
(B.I.A. Apr. 3, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.