The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-1952•Zheni Naumova, a/k/a Zheni D. Naumova v. Sharonview Federal Credit Union
24-1952Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 4, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1952
ZHENI NAUMOVA, a/k/a Zheni D. Naumova,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SHARONVIEW FEDERAL CREDIT UNION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort.
Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (9:22-cv-04632-BHH)
Submitted: February 27, 2025 Decided: March 3, 2025
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Zheni Naumova, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Ashley Ahrens, JACKSON LEWIS PC,
Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Zheni Naumova appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s
recommendation to grant Defendant summary judgment on Naumova’s claims brought
pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, and
the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Naumova v. Sharonview Fed. Credit Union, No. 9:22-cv-04632-BHH (D.S.C. Sept. 26,
2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.