The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-1965•Julie Gaskins v. EK REAL ESTATE FUND I, LLC, An Affiliate of EasyKnock, Inc.
24-1965Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 30, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-1965
JULIE GASKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
EK REAL ESTATE FUND I, LLC, An Affiliate of EasyKnock, Inc.;
EASYKNOCK, INC.; TVC FUNDING III, LLC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
George L. Russell, III, Chief District Judge. (1:24-cv-00944-GLR)
Submitted: December 23, 2025 Decided: December 30, 2025
Before WILKINSON and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Julie A. Gaskins, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Laughlin Brown, GRAY REED, Dallas, Texas,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Julie A. Gaskins appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil action as
barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Because we conclude that Gaskins’s action is barred
by the doctrine of collateral estoppel, see Collins v. Pond Creek Mining Co., 468 F.3d 213,
217 (4th Cir. 2006) (setting forth elements of collateral estoppel), we affirm the district
court’s dismissal order on that basis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.