The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-2023•Victor Jackson v. New Kent Circuit Court
24-2023Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 31, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-2023
VICTOR JACKSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
NEW KENT CIRCUIT COURT; NEW KENT JDR COURT; NEW KENT
SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA (Victim
Witness Program),
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:24-cv-00330-MHL)
Submitted: March 27, 2025 Decided: March 31, 2025
Before THACKER and BERNER, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Victor Jackson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his amended complaint
without prejudice for failure to state a claim and failure to comply with a court order. We
have reviewed the record and discern no abuse of discretion in the district court’s dismissal
of Jackson’s amended complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for his failure to comply
with the court’s order regarding the proper form of his amended complaint. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. Jackson v. New Kent Cir. Ct., No. 3:24-cv-00330-
MHL (E.D. Va. Aug. 13, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.