The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-2046•Antinette Benson v. Securitas Security Services
24-2046Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 27, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-2046
ANTINETTE BENSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:23-cv-00049-BO-BM)
Submitted: May 22, 2025 Decided: May 27, 2025
Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Antinette Benson, Appellant Pro Se. Vanessa Nicole Garrido, Paul S. Holscher,
OGLETREE DEAKINS, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Antinette Benson appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion to
dismiss her amended complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Benson v.
Securitas Sec. Servs., No. 5:23-cv-00049-BO-BM (E.D.N.C. Sept. 19, 2024). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.