Jeremy Vickery v. Chick-Fil-A, Inc.

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-2097
JEREMY VICKERY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
AREA WIDE ELECTRIC,
Plaintiff,
v.
CHICK-FIL-A, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence.
Joseph Dawson, III, District Judge. (4:24-cv-01918-JD)
Submitted: February 27, 2025 Decided: March 3, 2025
Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Jeremy Vickery, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin Clement Bruner, BRUNER, POWELL,
WALL & MULLINS, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Jeremy Vickery appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge, dismissing without prejudice the claims of Area Wide Electric, and
dismissing Vickery’s claims with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Vickery v. Chick-Fil-A,
Inc., No. 4:24-cv-01918-JD (D.S.C. Sept. 17, 2024). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --