The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-2101•Shaomin Sui v. Fedex Ground Package System, Incorporated
24-2101Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 29, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-2101
SHAOMIN SUI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Deborah Lynn Boardman, District Judge. (1:19-cv-03318-DLB)
Submitted: January 23, 2025 Decided: January 28, 2025
Before WILKINSON, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shaomin Sui, Appellant Pro Se. Brian James Kluckman, Moon Township, Pennsylvania,
William George Whitman, IV, FEDEX GROUND, Coraopolis, Pennsylvania, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Shaomin Sui appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for
reconsideration of its order denying his motion to reopen his case. We have reviewed the
record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that Sui
failed to satisfy certain threshold criteria or to state any grounds for relief under Fed. R.
Civ. P. 60(b). See Justus v. Clarke, 78 F.4th 97, 105-06 (4th Cir. 2023) (discussing
standards for granting Rule 60(b) motion), cert. denied sub nom. Dotson v. Justus, 144 S.
Ct. 1096 (2024); Aikens v. Ingram, 652 F.3d 496, 501 (4th Cir. 2011) (en banc) (stating
standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Sui v. FedEx
Ground Package Sys., Inc., No. 1:19-cv-03318-DLB (D. Md. Oct. 11, 2024). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.