The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-2224•Richard J. Kwasny; Jill W. Kwasny; Ronald Wisla v. Newrez LLC
24-2224Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 3, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-2224
RICHARD J. KWASNY; JILL W. KWASNY; RONALD WISLA,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
NEWREZ LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (2:24-cv-00012-BO-RN)
Submitted: October 30, 2025 Decided: November 3, 2025
Before RUSHING and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard J. Kwasny, Jill W. Kwasny, Ronald Wisla, Appellants Pro Se. Steven Hix,
Jonathan Edward Schulz, BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP, Charlotte,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Richard J. Kwasny, Jill W. Kwasny, and Ronald Wisla appeal the district court’s
order granting Defendant’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion and dismissing their civil
action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
the district court’s order. Kwasny v. NewRez LLC, No. 2:24-cv-00012-BO-RN (E.D.N.C.
Nov. 8, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.