The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-2233•Karen Y. Baez v. Synectics for Managment Decisions, Inc.
24-2233Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 28, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-2233
KAREN Y. BAEZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SYNECTICS FOR MANAGMENT DECISIONS, INC.; BECKER VISSEPP PSC,
c/o Jane Becker Whitaker, Lawyer; LAW OFFICES OF MATHEW
MUGGERIDGE, c/o Hector I. Hernandez, Lawyer; RICHARD E. HAGERTY;
NIXON PEABODY, c/o Myra A. Benjamin,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Patricia Tolliver Giles, District Judge. (1:24-cv-01350-PTG-WEF)
Submitted: April 24, 2025 Decided: April 28, 2025
Before RICHARDSON and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Karen Y. Baez, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Karen Y. Baez appeals the district court’s order reviewing her civil complaint
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, denying her motions for leave to proceed in the district court
without prepayment of fees or costs, and denying all other pending motions as moot. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district
court’s order. Baez v. Synectics for Mgmt. Decisions, Inc., No. 1:24-cv-01350-PTG-WEF
(E.D. Va. Nov. 14, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.