The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-2246•Kevin Donnell Murphy v. KELLY O. HAYES, Acting U.S. Attorney
24-2246Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 13, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-2246
KEVIN DONNELL MURPHY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KELLY O. HAYES, Acting U.S. Attorney; MEGAN L. MICCO, Assistant United
States Attorney; JUDGE STEPHANIE A. GALLAGHER, United States District
Court for the District of Maryland; RUTH SHUMAN, National Science Foundation,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Brendan A. Hurson, District Judge. (1:24-cv-02666-BAH)
Submitted: March 11, 2024 Decided: March 13, 2025
Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Donnell Murphy, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Donnell Murphy appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) as frivolous. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
Murphy v. Barron, No. 1:24-cv-02666-BAH (D. Md. Nov. 27, 2024). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.