The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-6232•United States of America v. Quentin Dwayne Mcnebb, a/k/a QB
24-6232Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 29, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6232
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
QUENTIN DWAYNE MCNEBB, a/k/a QB,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at
Danville. James P. Jones, Senior District Judge. (4:12-cr-00001-JPJ-4)
Submitted: September 25, 2025 Decided: September 29, 2025
Before GREGORY and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Quentin Dwayne McNebb, Appellant Pro Se. Rachel Barish Swartz, Special Assistant
United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Quentin Dwayne McNebb appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Amendment 821 to the
Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and finding no reversible error. See
United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304 (4th Cir. 2013) (providing standard).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. McNebb, No. 4:12-cr-
00001-JPJ-4 (W.D. Va. Feb. 20, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.