The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-6242•Dea’shawn Harrison v. ALAN WILSON, Attorney General of South Carolina; THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
24-6242Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 2, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6242
DEA’SHAWN HARRISON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ALAN WILSON, Attorney General of South Carolina; THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort.
Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (9:23-cv-02745-RMG)
Submitted: July 30, 2024 Decided: August 2, 2024
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dea’Shawn Harrison, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dea’Shawn Harrison appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Harrison’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Harrison’s motion for production of a transcript at
government expense and affirm the district court’s order. Harrison v. Wilson, No. 9:23-
cv-02745-RMG (D.S.C. Jan. 25, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.