The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-6247•United States of America v. Ricky Douglas Crawford, Jr.
24-6247Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 28, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6247
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RICKY DOUGLAS CRAWFORD, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Jr., District Judge. (1:14-cr-00138-WO-1)
Submitted: June 25, 2024 Decided: June 28, 2024
Before RICHARDSON and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ricky Douglas Crawford, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ricky Douglas Crawford, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his second
motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have reviewed the
record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion by finding that the
18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors weighed against Crawford’s release or by denying Crawford’s
motion to appoint counsel. See United States v. Malone, 57 F.4th 167, 172 (4th Cir. 2023)
(stating standard of review for denial of compassionate release); Miller v. Simmons, 814
F.2d 962, 966 (4th Cir. 1987) (stating standard of review for denial of motion to appoint
counsel). Accordingly, we grant Crawford’s motion to file a supplemental informal brief,
and we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Crawford, No. 1:14-cr-00138-
WO-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 29, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.