The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-6249•Cecil Jerome Quinn, Jr. v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA MARSHALS, 7th Judicial, Spartanburg
24-6249Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 26, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6249
CECIL JEROME QUINN, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA MARSHALS, 7th Judicial, Spartanburg; AGENT
DILLION, 7th Judicial Parole Officer; WARDEN ROBERT MICHAEL,
Stevenston, III; WARDEN NELSON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior, District Judge. (8:23-cv-06176-HMH)
Submitted: February 20, 2025 Decided: February 25, 2025
Before AGEE, HARRIS, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cecil Jerome Quinn, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Cecil Jerome Quinn, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the
recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
See Shaw v. Foreman, 59 F.4th 121, 126 (4th Cir. 2023) (providing standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Quinn v State of South Carolina
Marshals, No. 8:23-cv-06176-HMH (D.S.C. Feb. 8, 2024). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.