The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-6317•Donald Vaughan v. Burnice Mace, Rn, Bsn
24-6317Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 24, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6317
DONALD VAUGHAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BURNICE MACE, RN, BSN; MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, in whole capacity;
CORIZON HEALTH; YESCARE HEALTH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Paula Xinis, District Judge. (1:22-cv-03134-PX)
Submitted: September 19, 2024 Decided: September 24, 2024
Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Doc Vaughan, Appellant Pro Se. Megan Trocki Mantzavinos, MARKS, O’NEILL,
O’BRIEN, DOHERTY & KELLY, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Donald Vaughan appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants summary
judgment in Vaughan’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Vaughan v. Mace,
No. 1:22-cv-03134-PX (D. Md. Mar. 19, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.