The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-6352•David Atkins, Jr. v. DOCTOR SHAMAR, Facility Doctor
24-6352Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 30, 2025
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6352
DAVID ATKINS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DOCTOR SHAMAR, Facility Doctor; NURSE STITH, RN; MS. OSEGHALE,
Food Service Supervisor; MR. FOXX; MS. HOBBS; NATARCHA GREGG, State
Dietician,
Defendants - Appellees,
WARDEN MILLER,
Party-in-Interest - Appellee,
and
T. WILLIAMS, Warden; J. D. OATES, III, Assistant Warden,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:22-cv-00630-LMB-JFA)
Submitted: December 23, 2025 Decided: December 30, 2025
Before WILKINSON and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Atkins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Martin Muldowney, SANDS ANDERSON,
PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
David Atkins, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s order. Adkins v. Shamar, No. 1:22-cv-00630-LMB-JFA (E.D.
Va. Mar. 27, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.