The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
24-6377•Larry Blakney v. MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General of U.S.; WARDEN T. SCARANTINO
24-6377Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 24, 2024
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 24-6377
LARRY BLAKNEY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
MERRICK GARLAND, Attorney General of U.S.; WARDEN T. SCARANTINO,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at
Raleigh. Richard E. Myers, II, Chief District Judge. (5:24-hc-02067-M)
Submitted: September 19, 2024 Decided: September 24, 2024
Before NIEMEYER, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Blakney, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Larry Blakney appeals the district court’s order dismissing for lack of exhaustion
his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging the propriety of his commitment to the custody
of the Attorney General pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4246. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Blakney v.
Garland, No. 5:24-hc-02067-M (E.D.N.C. Apr. 12, 2024). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.